COVID-19: Making the best out of a bad situation

By Martin Fowler - March 24, 2020

At the end of 2019, following the phase one trade deal between the United States and China, markets continued their near decade long ascendancy with renewed enthusiasm.

Read: Sydney Wealth Management Update Autumn 2020

The rally rapidly began to lose momentum around February 21 when it became clear that the coronavirus known as COVID-19 was not going to be contained within China and had begun to spread throughout the world. Within days the market began to slide before plummeting as images of hospitals in Italy bursting at the seams, overwhelmed by the sheer scale and magnitude of the disease began to fill the newsfeeds. When it became clear that the unprecedented scale and magnitude of this virus was going to close borders and disrupt businesses around the world for an unknown duration, fear and panic took over and a meltdown ensued as global markets registered some of their heaviest daily falls in history.

At times of extreme fear and uncertainty, investors often lose sight of how shares are fundamentally valued and instead extrapolate worst case scenarios over multi-year time frames without any rational thought. At such times it can be helpful to have at least a basic understanding of the mechanics of share valuations to improve decision making.

Share valuations are simply the sum of the present value of future cashflows. Mathematically, this can be represented as follows:

While the health and economic impacts of COVID-19 are undoubtedly unprecedented (except for the Spanish flu), there have already been numerous reports of scientific breakthroughs that point to a moderate to high probability of having a commercially available vaccine within 12 to 18 months. Using this logic, we can start to stress test the impact on company valuations.


Based on consensus earnings expectations as at 10 March 2020, the formula derives a fair value for a Big 4 Bank of $25.77. We know it takes time for analysts to revise their earnings expectations in light of any change in circumstances and so the current expectations inevitably will be revised lower in coming months. Nevertheless, even if we assume this bank’s earnings plummet on bad debts in FY20 and FY21, and the bank records no earnings whatsoever over those two years, before rebounding in FY22, the formula derives a fair value of $22.66, which is still well above the actual market value of $15.98 (as at 16 March 2020). Further, in two years’ time, when these bad years are no longer included in the valuation, fair value moves back towards $27 (all other things being equal).

Big 4 banks

Consensus expectations1

Stress tested

FY20 EPS[1] (f)


$ -

FY21 EPS (f)


$ -

FY22 EPS (e)



Terminal growth rate:



Discount Factor - WACC:



Intrinsic Valuation:



Market value 16 March 2020:



Potential Under-valuation:




It is important to understand that companies are valued over 20+ year time horizons, not over 6-18 months. During times of fear and panic, an understanding of basic valuation principles can help you make more rational decisions. Equally, it is also important to understand that share valuations are only as good as the assumptions on which they are based. A company that may screen cheap on valuation may ultimately disappoint if the underlying earnings assumptions prove too optimistic. This may be for any number of reasons including because the depth and duration of the recession are worse than expected, the company is poorly managed, costs escalate outside its control, or structural changes reduce its competitive advantages over time. Further, companies with highly cyclical cashflows and stretched balance sheets lumbered with too much debt are highly vulnerable during periods of high economic uncertainty and are more susceptible to failure. These are the value traps that should be avoided no matter how cheap they might appear.  

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. Any advice included in this newsletter has been prepared without taking into account your objectives, financial situations or needs. Before acting on the advice you should consider whether it’s appropriate to you, in light of your objectives, financial situation or needs. You should also obtain a copy of and consider the Product Disclosure Statement for any financial product mentioned before making any decisions. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. Advisors at Pitcher Partner Sydney Wealth Management are authorised representatives of Pitcher Partners Sydney Wealth management Pty Ltd, ABN 85 135 817 766, AFS and Credit Licence number 336950.

[1] EPS – adjusted earnings per share (proxy for cashflows)


Contact our experts

Other articles


Top of Page


Rob Southwell

Rob Southwell's picture


Managing Partner and Partner – Private Business and Family Advisory

> View profile

Brendan Britten

Brendan Britten's picture


Managing Partner and Executive Director/Partner- Business Advisory and Assurance

> View profile

Nigel Fischer

Nigel Fischer's picture


Managing Partner - Private Business and Family Advisory

> View profile

Michael Minter

Michael Minter's picture


Managing Partner

> View profile

Leon Mok

Leon Mok's picture


Managing Director

> View profile

Ben Brazier

Ben Brazier's picture


Managing Principal

> View profile

Partnership fraud


Paperwork and independent advice saves partnerships from fraud

Discover more

Kia Ora Horse Stud


Pitcher Partners fills a Financial Manager gap to keep the business on track

Discover more

Fuel Injection Company Administration


A fuel injection company began life as an Australian public company before being acquired by a UK publicly listed company while in the research and development stage of a “green...

Discover more

@PitcherPartner GRAB A BITE | Our Sydney firm brought their partnership together this week to hash out ideas for our Sydney roadmap…